<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sensational Color Pro Kate Smith&#039;s Online Color Journal &#187; trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/tag/trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro</link>
	<description>What I&#039;m reading, thinking about, working on in color</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:55:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Telia Wins Court Case on the Pink Color</title>
		<link>http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/telia-wins-court-case-on-the-pink-color/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/telia-wins-court-case-on-the-pink-color/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand, Trademark or Signature Color]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/telia-wins-court-case-on-the-pink-color/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Telia is not a brand recognized in the U.S. but parent company Deutsche Telekom parent company of T-mobile is and many of you might recall that in the past that they have taken steps to keep competitors from using magenta in their branding.
This time however they weren&#8217;t successful in their action and I just posted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img title="Telia_magenta_logo.jpg" src="http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/Telia_magenta_logo.jpg" border="0" alt="Telia_magenta_logo.jpg" width="250" height="63" /></p>
<p>Telia is not a brand recognized in the U.S. but parent company Deutsche Telekom parent company of T-mobile is and many of you might recall that in the past that they have <a href="http://www.sensationalcolor.com/business/brand-trademark-signature/t-mobile-magenta.html" target="_blank">taken steps to keep competitors from using magenta in their branding</a>.</p>
<p>This time however they weren&#8217;t successful in their action and I just posted a short article about <a href="http://www.sensationalcolor.com/business/brand-trademark-signature/telia-wins-court-case-on-the-pink-color.html" target="_blank">the outcome of this legal action&#8230; </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/telia-wins-court-case-on-the-pink-color/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cadbury Does Not Own the Color Purple</title>
		<link>http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/cadbury-does-not-own-the-color-purple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/cadbury-does-not-own-the-color-purple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 22:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kate Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand, Trademark or Signature Color]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/cadbury-does-not-own-the-color-purple/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cadbury Schweppes launched a civil case in the Australian courts in an attempt to stop rival retailer Darrell Lea from using dark purple in its marketing.

After five years and millions of dollars in legal fees the Federal Court ruled that Cadbury does not own the color and is not entitled to the exclusive use of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cadbury Schweppes launched a civil case in the Australian courts in an attempt to stop rival retailer Darrell Lea from using dark purple in its marketing.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img title="cadbury.jpg" src="http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/cadbury.jpg" border="0" alt="cadbury.jpg" width="121" height="83" /></p>
<p>After five years and millions of dollars in legal fees the Federal Court ruled that Cadbury does not own the color and is not entitled to the exclusive use of dark purple.</p>
<p>Cadbury maintains its position and is likely to appeal.</p>
<p>Hear the ABC News interview <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/04/11/2214856.htm?section=australia" target="_blank">here&#8230;</a></p>
<p>What do you think? Should Cadbury be able to protect their brand color?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sensationalcolor.com/colorpro/cadbury-does-not-own-the-color-purple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
